The paradox of advertising

I just saw this post by Gareth over at his blog, Brand New.  I hope he doesn’t mind me replicating it in its entirety here, I just think it’s a great observation.

We spend 90% of our money distributing an idea and 10% on the content of the idea.

Yet we spend 90% of our time and interest on the content of the idea and 10% on its distribution.
Clearly it’s time for a new model with a better distribution of money and attention.

Never a truer word was spoken (written?).

What we spend money on has a great way of cutting through to what we value (Joel Peterson, the current Chariman of the Board for JetBlue Airways, gave a great talk at a Stanford Business School class on this).

In advertising, 90% of the money is spent on distribution because no one really believes the content works – despite all the time and effort that goes into it!

This mismatch between time, money, and effort is because these decidedly continuous variables are used to produce a somewhat binary outcome – great ideas work, nearly great ones don’t.

The only way to change this equation is to change the scope of the idea – a bunch of smaller great ideas will always out perform a nearly great big idea.
 
But we just can’t NOT chase that next big idea, can we? 

Comments are closed.